↓ Skip to main content

A Critical Evaluation of the Biological Construct Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Size Matters but So Does the Measurement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
256 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Critical Evaluation of the Biological Construct Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Size Matters but So Does the Measurement
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cody T. Haun, Christopher G. Vann, Brandon M. Roberts, Andrew D. Vigotsky, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Michael D. Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 389 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 12%
Student > Master 43 11%
Researcher 22 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 123 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 131 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 132 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#255,498
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#139
of 15,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,544
of 366,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#5
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.