↓ Skip to main content

Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
71 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guro Strøm Solli, Espen Tønnessen, Øyvind Sandbakk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 73 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#688,671
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#358
of 15,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,728
of 366,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#18
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.