↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 15,721)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
328 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
21 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
828 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thimo Wiewelhove, Alexander Döweling, Christoph Schneider, Laura Hottenrott, Tim Meyer, Michael Kellmann, Mark Pfeiffer, Alexander Ferrauti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 328 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 828 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 828 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 141 17%
Student > Master 92 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 5%
Researcher 37 4%
Other 112 14%
Unknown 354 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 250 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 6%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Other 37 4%
Unknown 371 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 824. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,810
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7
of 15,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#467
of 367,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#1
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.