You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Evaluation of the Safety Threshold for Allograft Macrovesicular Steatosis in Cadaveric Liver Transplantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhengtao Liu, Junjun Jia, Huaijun Ning, Shuping Que, Lin Zhou, Shusen Zheng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,396,918
of 25,090,809 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,242
of 15,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,793
of 356,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#156
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,090,809 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.