You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Endothelial Function and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Winston Boff, Antonio M. da Silva, Juliano B. Farinha, Josianne Rodrigues-Krause, Alvaro Reischak-Oliveira, Balduino Tschiedel, Marcia Puñales, Marcello C. Bertoluci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 48 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,012,676
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,089
of 13,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,407
of 350,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#162
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.