You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromuscular and Muscle Metabolic Functions in MELAS Before and After Resistance Training: A Case Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Venturelli, Federica Villa, Federico Ruzzante, Cantor Tarperi, Doriana Rudi, Chiara Milanese, Valentina Cavedon, Cristina Fonte, Alessandro Picelli, Nicola Smania, Elisa Calabria, Spyros Skafidas, Gwenael Layec, Federico Schena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,181,328
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,999
of 13,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,971
of 349,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#194
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.