↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Two Different Neuromuscular Training Protocols on Regional Bone Mass in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Two Different Neuromuscular Training Protocols on Regional Bone Mass in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00846
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Marín-Cascales, Jacobo Á. Rubio-Arias, Pedro E. Alcaraz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Sports and Recreations 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 35 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,277,617
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,496
of 13,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,674
of 346,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#113
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.