You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Introduction and Optimization in the Non-model Insect Pyrrhocoris apterus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00891 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Kotwica-Rolinska, Lenka Chodakova, Daniela Chvalova, Lucie Kristofova, Iva Fenclova, Jan Provaznik, Maly Bertolutti, Bulah Chia-Hsiang Wu, David Dolezel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,535,395
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,075
of 14,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,208
of 347,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#94
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.