You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Bleaching Products With Up to 6% and With More Than 6% Hydrogen Peroxide: Whitening Efficacy Using BI and WID and Side Effects – An in vitro Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bledar Lilaj, Rinet Dauti, Hermann Agis, Martina Schmid-Schwap, Alexander Franz, Fabian Kanz, Andreas Moritz, Andreas Schedle, Barbara Cvikl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,050,502
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,787
of 13,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,816
of 342,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#169
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.