↓ Skip to main content

Baveno Criteria Safely Identify Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Who Can Avoid Variceal Screening Endoscopy: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Baveno Criteria Safely Identify Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Who Can Avoid Variceal Screening Endoscopy: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsolt Szakács, Bálint Erőss, Alexandra Soós, Péter Mátrai, Imre Szabó, Erika Pétervári, Judit Bajor, Nelli Farkas, Péter Hegyi, Anita Illés, Margit Solymár, Márta Balaskó, Patrícia Sarlós, Ákos Szűcs, József Czimmer, Áron Vincze, Gabriella Pár

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 45%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,505,161
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,063
of 14,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,039
of 343,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#82
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.