You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Baveno Criteria Safely Identify Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Who Can Avoid Variceal Screening Endoscopy: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01028 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zsolt Szakács, Bálint Erőss, Alexandra Soós, Péter Mátrai, Imre Szabó, Erika Pétervári, Judit Bajor, Nelli Farkas, Péter Hegyi, Anita Illés, Margit Solymár, Márta Balaskó, Patrícia Sarlós, Ákos Szűcs, József Czimmer, Áron Vincze, Gabriella Pár |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 4 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
India | 1 | 13% |
Hungary | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 27% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 45% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,505,161
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,063
of 14,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,039
of 343,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#82
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.