↓ Skip to main content

Co-ingestion of Antioxidant Drinks With an Unhealthy Challenge Meal Fails to Prevent Post-prandial Endothelial Dysfunction: An Open-Label, Crossover Study in Older Overweight Volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-ingestion of Antioxidant Drinks With an Unhealthy Challenge Meal Fails to Prevent Post-prandial Endothelial Dysfunction: An Open-Label, Crossover Study in Older Overweight Volunteers
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01293
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Muggeridge, Katarzyna Goszcz, Andrew Treweeke, Janet Adamson, Kirsty Hickson, Daniel Crabtree, Ian L. Megson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,322,130
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,934
of 13,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,162
of 353,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#69
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.