You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Pulse Width and Amplitude to Promote Central Activation in Individuals With Severe Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Arpin, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Gail Forrest, Susan J. Harkema, Enrico Rejc |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,540,651
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,707
of 13,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,249
of 356,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#96
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.