You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Circadian Clock Improves Fitness in the Fruit Fly, Drosophila melanogaster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01374 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Horn, Oliver Mitesser, Thomas Hovestadt, Taishi Yoshii, Dirk Rieger, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,289,620
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,641
of 15,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,170
of 369,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#108
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.