↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Pre-exhaustion Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Training Volume, Maximal Strength, and Quadriceps Hypertrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Pre-exhaustion Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Training Volume, Maximal Strength, and Quadriceps Hypertrophy
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thiago Barbosa Trindade, Jonato Prestes, Leônidas Oliveira Neto, Radamés Maciel Vitor Medeiros, Ramires Alsamir Tibana, Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa, Eduardo Estevan Santana, Breno Guilherme de A. T. Cabral, Whitley Jo Stone, Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 5 4%
Lecturer 4 3%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 43 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 56 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,260,707
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,734
of 15,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,520
of 474,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#34
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.