↓ Skip to main content

Aerobic Training Is Better Than Resistance Training on Cardiac Function and Autonomic Modulation in Female ob/ob Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerobic Training Is Better Than Resistance Training on Cardiac Function and Autonomic Modulation in Female ob/ob Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipe Fernandes Stoyell-Conti, Maria-Claudia Irigoyen, Michelle Sartori, Amanda Aparecida Ribeiro, Fernando dos Santos, Jacqueline Freire Machi, Diego Mendrot Taboas Figueroa, Bruno Rodrigues, Kátia De Angelis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 25 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,313,060
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,216
of 14,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,512
of 461,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#88
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.