↓ Skip to main content

To Flex or Rest: Does Adding No-Load Isometric Actions to the Inter-Set Rest Period in Resistance Training Enhance Muscular Adaptations? A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
127 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To Flex or Rest: Does Adding No-Load Isometric Actions to the Inter-Set Rest Period in Resistance Training Enhance Muscular Adaptations? A Randomized-Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01571
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad J. Schoenfeld, Jozo Grgic, Bret Contreras, Kenneth Delcastillo, Andrew Alto, Cody Haun, Eduardo O. De Souza, Andrew D. Vigotsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 23%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 49 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#519,584
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#279
of 15,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,984
of 480,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.