You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic Force Production Capacities Between Coronary Artery Disease Patients vs. Healthy Participants on a Cycle Ergometer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01639 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Fanget, Jérémy Rossi, Pierre Samozino, Jean-Benoît Morin, Rodolphe Testa, Frédéric Roche, Thierry Busso, Jari Antero Laukkanen, David Hupin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 18% |
| Brazil | 2 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,109,990
of 24,071,812 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,660
of 14,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,586
of 458,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#37
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,812 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.