↓ Skip to main content

Living Without Temporal Cues: A Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
31 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Living Without Temporal Cues: A Case Study
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria-Angeles Bonmati-Carrion, Victoria L. Revell, Tom J. Cook, Thomas R. E. Welch, Maria-Angeles Rol, Debra J. Skene, Juan Antonio Madrid

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 11%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#990,322
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#546
of 15,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,041
of 475,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#18
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.