You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling Bainbridge-Ropers Syndrome in Xenopus laevis Embryos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00075 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hava Lichtig, Artyom Artamonov, Hanna Polevoy, Christine D. Reid, Stephanie L. Bielas, Dale Frank |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Austria | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,272,786
of 24,795,084 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,684
of 15,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,072
of 365,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#60
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,795,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.