↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Cause Muscle Damage? Commentary on Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
56 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Cause Muscle Damage? Commentary on Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Wernbom, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Gøran Paulsen, Thomas Bjørnsen, Kristoffer T. Cumming, Per Aagaard, Brian C. Clark, Truls Raastad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 18%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 33 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#681,915
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#352
of 15,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,566
of 392,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.