You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Antônio R. Da Silva, Liliana C. Baptista, Rafael S. Neves, Elias De França, Helena Loureiro, Fabio Santos Lira, Erico C. Caperuto, Manuel T. Veríssimo, Raul A. Martins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 36 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,933,873
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,912
of 13,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,673
of 398,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#193
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.