| Title |
Disentangling the Hypothesis of Host Dysosmia and SARS-CoV-2: The Bait Symptom That Hides Neglected Neurophysiological Routes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Briguglio, Alberto Bona, Mauro Porta, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Fabrizio Ernesto Pregliasco, Giuseppe Banfi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Guinea | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,332,394
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,495
of 14,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,174
of 401,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#134
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.