You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should I Lay or Should I Grow: Photoperiodic Versus Metabolic Cues in Chickens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00707 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlene Hanlon, Ramesh Ramachandran, Martin J. Zuidhof, Grégoy Y. Bédécarrats |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,616,931
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,310
of 13,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,300
of 399,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#101
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.