↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Portuguese Variant of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQPT)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Portuguese Variant of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQPT)
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cátia Reis, Sara Gamboa Madeira, Luísa V. Lopes, Teresa Paiva, Till Roenneberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Psychology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 30 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#16,045,827
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,008
of 15,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,388
of 404,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#234
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.