| Title |
Potential Mechanisms for COVID-19 Induced Anosmia and Dysgeusia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.01039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrien A. Eshraghi, Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Camron Davies, Fred F. Telischi, Nirupa Chaudhari, Rahul Mittal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,214,218
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,018
of 13,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,570
of 376,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#181
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.