You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Optimal Weight Carriage System for Runners: Comparison Between Handheld Water Bottles, Waist Belts, and Backpacks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.571221 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Volker Scheer, Solveig Vieluf, Niko Bitter, Leon Christ, Hans-Christian Heitkamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 24% |
Canada | 3 | 12% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
Iraq | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,535,656
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#843
of 15,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,995
of 433,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#25
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.