You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of Desiccation Tolerance: Themes and Variations in Brine Shrimp, Roundworms, and Tardigrades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.592016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan D. Hibshman, James S. Clegg, Bob Goldstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,731,391
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,487
of 15,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,449
of 441,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#52
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.