You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selective Effects of Manual Massage and Foam Rolling on Perceived Recovery and Performance: Current Knowledge and Future Directions Toward Robotic Massages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.598898 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yann Kerautret, Franck Di Rienzo, Carole Eyssautier, Aymeric Guillot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,196,335
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#655
of 15,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,153
of 520,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#23
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.