You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Targeting Endolysosomal Two-Pore Channels to Treat Cardiovascular Disorders in the Novel COronaVIrus Disease 2019
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.629119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesco Moccia, Sharon Negri, Pawan Faris, Angelica Perna, Antonio De Luca, Teresa Soda, Roberto Berra-Romani, Germano Guerra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 18% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Poland | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,051,020
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,128
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,591
of 537,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#41
of 467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.