↓ Skip to main content

Recovery From Eccentric Squat Exercise in Resistance-Trained Young and Master Athletes With Similar Maximum Strength: Combining Cold Water Immersion and Compression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recovery From Eccentric Squat Exercise in Resistance-Trained Young and Master Athletes With Similar Maximum Strength: Combining Cold Water Immersion and Compression
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.665204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Schmidt, Alexander Ferrauti, Michael Kellmann, Florian Beaudouin, Mark Pfeiffer, Nicola Reiner Volk, Jan Martin Wambach, Oliver Bruder, Thimo Wiewelhove

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 25 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Unspecified 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,025,659
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,795
of 14,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,929
of 429,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#278
of 717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.