↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Trigger in Ventilated Non-ARDS Patients: A Phenomenon Can Not Be Ignored!

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reverse Trigger in Ventilated Non-ARDS Patients: A Phenomenon Can Not Be Ignored!
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.670172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhimin Lin, Jing Zhou, Xiaoling Lin, Yingzhi Wang, Haichong Zheng, Weixiang Huang, Xiaoqing Liu, Yimin Li, Nanshan Zhong, Yongbo Huang, Yuanda Xu, Ling Sang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,775,765
of 23,967,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,512
of 14,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,794
of 436,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#168
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,967,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.