You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantifying Fatigue in the Rugby Codes: The Interplay Between Collision Characteristics and Neuromuscular Performance, Biochemical Measures, and Self-Reported Assessments of Fatigue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.711634 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mitchell Naughton, Scott McLean, Tannath J. Scott, Dan Weaving, Colin Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 9 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
France | 3 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
Scientists | 12 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 21 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 26 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,687,797
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#917
of 15,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,553
of 445,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#30
of 708 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 708 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.