↓ Skip to main content

Use of hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes to Rule Out Proarrhythmic Effects of Drugs: The Case of Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes to Rule Out Proarrhythmic Effects of Drugs: The Case of Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.730127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Sala, Vladislav Leonov, Manuela Mura, Federica Giannetti, Aleksandr Khudiakov, Alessandra Moretti, Lia Crotti, Massimiliano Gnecchi, Peter J. Schwartz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 32%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,564,341
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,621
of 13,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,808
of 504,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#196
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.