↓ Skip to main content

Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Normalization in Bradysia odoriphaga (Diptera: Sciaridae) Under Insecticides Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Normalization in Bradysia odoriphaga (Diptera: Sciaridae) Under Insecticides Stress
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.818210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiyan Fu, Tubiao Huang, Cheng Yin, Zhenhua Xu, Chao Li, Chunguang Liu, Tong Wu, Fuqiang Song, Fujuan Feng, Fengshan Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,140,388
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,093
of 14,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,558
of 515,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#74
of 717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.