↓ Skip to main content

Incorrectly corrected? QT interval analysis in rats and mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incorrectly corrected? QT interval analysis in rats and mice
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.1002203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wesam Mulla, Michael Murninkas, Or Levi, Yoram Etzion

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,943,319
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#10,199
of 15,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,199
of 430,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#470
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.