↓ Skip to main content

Basic Research Approaches to Evaluate Cardiac Arrhythmia in Heart Failure and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basic Research Approaches to Evaluate Cardiac Arrhythmia in Heart Failure and Beyond
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.806366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max J. Cumberland, Leto L. Riebel, Ashwin Roy, Christopher O’Shea, Andrew P. Holmes, Chris Denning, Paulus Kirchhof, Blanca Rodriguez, Katja Gehmlich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 16 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 17 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,607,349
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,375
of 15,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,277
of 513,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#96
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.