↓ Skip to main content

Agreement, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity of an Outdoor, Wearable-Based Walk Ratio Assessment in Healthy Adults and Chronic Stroke Survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agreement, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity of an Outdoor, Wearable-Based Walk Ratio Assessment in Healthy Adults and Chronic Stroke Survivors
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.857963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone K. Huber, Ruud H. Knols, Jeremia P. O. Held, Tom Christen, Eling D. de Bruin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,079,409
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,231
of 13,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,200
of 440,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#136
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.