↓ Skip to main content

The Performance-Result Gap in Mixed-Reality Cycling – Evidence From the Virtual Tour de France 2020 on Zwift

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Performance-Result Gap in Mixed-Reality Cycling – Evidence From the Virtual Tour de France 2020 on Zwift
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.868902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Westmattelmann, Benedikt Stoffers, Marius Sprenger, Jan-Gerrit Grotenhermen, Gerhard Schewe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,269,607
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,035
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,894
of 442,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#187
of 699 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 699 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.