↓ Skip to main content

A Parameter Representing Missing Charge Should Be Considered when Calibrating Action Potential Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Parameter Representing Missing Charge Should Be Considered when Calibrating Action Potential Models
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.879035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yann-Stanislas H. M. Barral, Joseph G. Shuttleworth, Michael Clerx, Dominic G. Whittaker, Ken Wang, Liudmila Polonchuk, David J. Gavaghan, Gary R. Mirams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,492,558
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,371
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,528
of 443,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#210
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.