↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of 16 studies in nine rodent models does not support the hypothesis that diabetic polyuria is a main reason of urinary bladder enlargement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of 16 studies in nine rodent models does not support the hypothesis that diabetic polyuria is a main reason of urinary bladder enlargement
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.923555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zeynep E. Yesilyurt, Jan Matthes, Edith Hintermann, Tamara R. Castañeda, Ralf Elvert, Jesus H. Beltran-Ornelas, Diana L. Silva-Velasco, Ning Xia, Aimo Kannt, Urs Christen, David Centurión, Huige Li, Andrea Pautz, Ebru Arioglu-Inan, Martin C. Michel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,490,417
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,497
of 13,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,193
of 431,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#456
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.