↓ Skip to main content

Numerical and experimental methods used to evaluate active drag in swimming: A systematic narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numerical and experimental methods used to evaluate active drag in swimming: A systematic narrative review
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.938658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiago J. Lopes, Jorge E. Morais, Mafalda P. Pinto, Daniel A. Marinho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 37%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,937,276
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,261
of 15,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,568
of 434,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#87
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.