↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Mathematical and computational methods in physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Mathematical and computational methods in physiology
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.975075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Femia, Juan Melchor, Pedro Carmona-Saez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,463,203
of 25,011,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,349
of 15,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,683
of 423,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#231
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.