↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness, implementation, and monitoring variables of intermittent hypoxic bicycle training in patients recovered from COVID-19: The AEROBICOVID study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness, implementation, and monitoring variables of intermittent hypoxic bicycle training in patients recovered from COVID-19: The AEROBICOVID study
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.977519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Peinado Costa, Alba Camacho-Cardenosa, Javier Brazo-Sayavera, Marcela Coffacci De Lima Viliod, Marta Camacho-Cardenosa, Yan Figueiredo Foresti, Carlos Dellavechia de Carvalho, Eugenio Merellano-Navarro, Marcelo Papoti, Átila Alexandre Trapé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,045,568
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,034
of 14,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,266
of 444,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#115
of 705 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 705 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.