↓ Skip to main content

Effect of continuous aerobic exercise on endothelial function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of continuous aerobic exercise on endothelial function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1043108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xifeng Tao, Yiyan Chen, Kai Zhen, Shiqi Ren, Yuanyuan Lv, Laikang Yu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Sports and Recreations 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Psychology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,335,945
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,382
of 15,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,491
of 482,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#174
of 585 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 585 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.