↓ Skip to main content

Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1134778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludwig Rappelt, Steffen Held, Tim Wiedenmann, Jan-Philip Deutsch, Jonas Hochstrate, Pamela Wicker, Lars Donath

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 4 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,053,972
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,672
of 15,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,882
of 417,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#146
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.