↓ Skip to main content

How did Bursaphelenchus nematodes acquire a specific relationship with their beetle vectors, Monochamus?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How did Bursaphelenchus nematodes acquire a specific relationship with their beetle vectors, Monochamus?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1209695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haru Kirino, Noritoshi Maehara, Ryoji Shinya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,848,746
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,146
of 14,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,683
of 244,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#78
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.