↓ Skip to main content

In vivo bistatic dual-aperture ultrasound imaging and elastography of the abdominal aorta

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo bistatic dual-aperture ultrasound imaging and elastography of the abdominal aorta
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1320456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera H. J. van Hal, Hein de Hoop, Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek, Hans-Martin Schwab, Richard G. P. Lopata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 50%
Unspecified 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,948,359
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#10,545
of 15,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,422
of 159,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#52
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.