↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance elastography resolving all gross anatomical segments of the kidney during controlled hydration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance elastography resolving all gross anatomical segments of the kidney during controlled hydration
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1327407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Wolf, Omar Darwish, Radhouene Neji, Michael Eder, Gere Sunder-Plassmann, Gertraud Heinz, Simon Daniel Robinson, Albrecht Ingo Schmid, Ewald V. Moser, Ralph Sinkus, Martin Meyerspeer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,705,251
of 25,328,635 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#10,460
of 15,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,002
of 157,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#46
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,328,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.