You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The iPlant Collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for Plant Biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2011.00034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen A. Goff, Matthew Vaughn, Sheldon McKay, Eric Lyons, Ann E. Stapleton, Damian Gessler, Naim Matasci, Liya Wang, Matthew Hanlon, Andrew Lenards, Andy Muir, Nirav Merchant, Sonya Lowry, Stephen Mock, Matthew Helmke, Adam Kubach, Martha Narro, Nicole Hopkins, David Micklos, Uwe Hilgert, Michael Gonzales, Chris Jordan, Edwin Skidmore, Rion Dooley, John Cazes, Robert McLay, Zhenyuan Lu, Shiran Pasternak, Lars Koesterke, William H. Piel, Ruth Grene, Christos Noutsos, Karla Gendler, Xin Feng, Chunlao Tang, Monica Lent, Seung-Jin Kim, Kristian Kvilekval, B. S. Manjunath, Val Tannen, Alexandros Stamatakis, Michael Sanderson, Stephen M. Welch, Karen A. Cranston, Pamela Soltis, Doug Soltis, Brian O'Meara, Cecile Ane, Tom Brutnell, Daniel J. Kleibenstein, Jeffery W. White, James Leebens-Mack, Michael J. Donoghue, Edgar P. Spalding, Todd J. Vision, Christopher R. Myers, David Lowenthal, Brian J. Enquist, Brad Boyle, Ali Akoglu, Greg Andrews, Sudha Ram, Doreen Ware, Lincoln Stein, Dan Stanzione |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 7% |
| Professor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 158 | 45% |
| Computer Science | 46 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 4% |
| Engineering | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,839,973
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#700
of 19,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,627
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.