↓ Skip to main content

Geometric Constraints and the Anatomical Interpretation of Twisted Plant Organ Phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geometric Constraints and the Anatomical Interpretation of Twisted Plant Organ Phenotypes
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2011.00062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renate Weizbauer, Winfried S. Peters, Burkhard Schulz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,500
of 19,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,968
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#29
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.